stud·y /ˈstədē/
1. the devotion of time and attention to acquiring knowledge on an academic subject, especially by means of books. "the study of English"
2. a detailed investigation and analysis of a subject or situation.
Does a large part of society really not understand why it’s a really bad idea to use mRNA or viral vector DNA to “vaccinate” someone who has natural immunity to COVID?
Why no, no they don't. Please explain.
From a Twitter thread by
Dr. Doug Corrigan @ScienceWDrDoug
Ph.D. Biochemist & Molecular Biologist, Physicist, Award Winning Global Super Solver, Materials Scientist, Innovator, Space Enthusiast
Does a large part of society really not understand why it’s a really bad idea to use mRNA or viral vector DNA to “vaccinate” someone who has natural immunity to COVID? Do people really not know what the immune system does to cells that express antigens on their surface?
The immune system takes antigen-expressing cells out of commission via Cytotoxic T Cells (CD8+), Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity, and the Classical Pathway of the Complement System via Complement Dependent Lysis (CDL).
Since mRNA lipid nanoparticles have access to many cell types via circulation, we have to assume that a great diversity of cells in different tissues become Spike-protein expressing factories. The spike protein on the surface of these cells targets them for immune attack.
Therefore, it is not surprising that adverse reactions for these types of vaccines are much higher in people with previously acquired natural immunity. Also, this is most likely why an adverse reaction to the 2nd jab is more extreme and prevalent.
With the recent paper demonstrating the presence of Spike on the membrane of circulating exosomes (which are released by spike producing host cells) for 4 months post vax, it would be sensible to measure the progression of inflammatory markers in the vaccinated over time.
Papers on increased adverse events when vaccinating someone with previously naturally acquired immunity:
Commentaires