Ideals which must be established by force and lies, are not good ideals
Knowing that over 99% of the population recover from covid.
If previous infection ensures not being re-infected or infecting others, and If being vaccinated does NOT ensure person from being infected or infecting others.
Which population will get over covid quicker, the highly vaccinated community or the lower vaccinated community? Which community can never have herd immunity?
Updated: Dec 20, 2022
For our story we will call our American citizen, Citizen A.
Citizen A (C.A.) has long been diagnosed with an enlarged heart (cardiomegaly). C.A. has been told that the condition is probably hereditary but needs to be monitored in the coming years as C.A. grows older. C.A. lives a fairly healthy and active life, doesn't drink or smoke, stays active and in general is a healthy individual.
Then Covid -19 comes on the scene. One of the possible side effects of catching covid is Myocarditis, Inflammation of the middle layer of the heart wall. Obviously this is something that would not be good for C.A. and he would seem to be a perfect candidate for a vaccine to avoid this possible life threatening covid side effect.
C.A. has a problem though, the vaccines too have the potential side effect of Myocarditis. Now C.A.'s only potential escape from covid is also a potential life threatening shot and in most cases two shots. This is why most Myocarditis side effects from the vaccine occur after a second shot. Now his employer under pressure from THE STATE is requiring, without medical exemption, for him to be vaccinated or lose his job. Suddenly various businesses do not allow C.A. to patronize them, THE STATE is threatening even further sanctions against the "unvaccinated" citizens and C.A. is stuck in a Twilight Zone of damned if he doesn't but possibly dead if he does .
But it's even worse. Now, because the vaccine is ineffective after a few months, boosters could be required and in order to comply with the fully vaccinated dictate of THE STATE, C.A. would be required to take even more shots in order to be in compliance. Each one increasing his risk of serious heart problems or death.
C.A. thought he had an out to the Catch 22 predicament which THE STATE health OFFICIALS have put him and his family in. You see, before the vaccine, C.A. contracted covid and, though sick, perhaps even a mild episode of Myocarditis, C.A. made it through and according to all tests and all science, is immune to Covid.
"Not acceptable," say THE STATE health OFFICIALS, Citizen A must be vaccinated for his own good and those around him
.
200,000 people a year are diagnosed with an enlarged heart. This means there are millions of Americans knowingly or unknowingly at risk if they take the vaccine. There are several reasons that obesity is the number one comorbidity in covid deaths, an enlarged heart (cardiomegaly) is certainly one of them. Is this aspect of the risks of taking the vaccine even discussed? Why no risk assessment for people like C.A. Soon, with the roll out of boosters and the coming children vaccinations the risks can only increase. It is not as if the risk of Myocarditis is going to diminish as people take more of the vaccine.
Does the Government have the right to tell citizens they must play Russian Roulette with their lives? Not in any America I lived in
Updated: Dec 20, 2022
stud·y /ˈstədē/
1. the devotion of time and attention to acquiring knowledge on an academic subject, especially by means of books. "the study of English"
2. a detailed investigation and analysis of a subject or situation.
Does a large part of society really not understand why it’s a really bad idea to use mRNA or viral vector DNA to “vaccinate” someone who has natural immunity to COVID?
Why no, no they don't. Please explain.
From a Twitter thread by
Dr. Doug Corrigan @ScienceWDrDoug
Ph.D. Biochemist & Molecular Biologist, Physicist, Award Winning Global Super Solver, Materials Scientist, Innovator, Space Enthusiast
Does a large part of society really not understand why it’s a really bad idea to use mRNA or viral vector DNA to “vaccinate” someone who has natural immunity to COVID? Do people really not know what the immune system does to cells that express antigens on their surface?
The immune system takes antigen-expressing cells out of commission via Cytotoxic T Cells (CD8+), Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity, and the Classical Pathway of the Complement System via Complement Dependent Lysis (CDL).
Since mRNA lipid nanoparticles have access to many cell types via circulation, we have to assume that a great diversity of cells in different tissues become Spike-protein expressing factories. The spike protein on the surface of these cells targets them for immune attack.
Therefore, it is not surprising that adverse reactions for these types of vaccines are much higher in people with previously acquired natural immunity. Also, this is most likely why an adverse reaction to the 2nd jab is more extreme and prevalent.
With the recent paper demonstrating the presence of Spike on the membrane of circulating exosomes (which are released by spike producing host cells) for 4 months post vax, it would be sensible to measure the progression of inflammatory markers in the vaccinated over time.
Papers on increased adverse events when vaccinating someone with previously naturally acquired immunity: