It's The Coverup-part 1
________________________________________________________________________
There is an old saying regarding political scandals, "It's not the crime, it's the coverup that gets you." When it comes to charges of voter fraud in the presidential election, the coverup is definitely "getting them." Unfortunately as that other old saying goes "If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it, did it really fall?"
In this sad, pitiful saga, the simple truth is that if it is not a fraud it would be relatively easy to disprove with open and transparent explanation for all the problems which have created suspicion. For the most part, at every level of the election process this much needed openness has been sorely lacking. In some cases I suspect that this is just a matter of administrators playing CYA, but regardless of the reason there is a coordinated effort, to suppress needed facts that could resolve issues. I want to look at just one, for now, others to follow.
The initial "conspiracy theories" were mostly driven by the numbers on election night. A little background is needed. After the 2000 Florida fiasco, media companies created the National Election Pool (NEP). NEP is the source for many media outlets exit polling and vote reporting. The nuts and bolts of all this is handled by Edison Research . This is from their website-
Vote Count
The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races. The NEP vote count from Edison Research is the only service continuously updated after Election Day. We track every vote until results are certified by all states. Vote count data is available for statewide results, vote by Congressional District, county vote data breakouts for statewide races, and all U.S. House races.
The fastest and most complete vote results
Multiple sources allow Edison Research to provide faster reporting of vote data than any other organization.
Edison collects the real time vote information, primarily from the individual state's secretary of state and sends it out to it's media partners. When they send it out it looks like this.
This is from an excellent article in American Thinker, It's in the Code: Hanky-Panky in Virginia's Votes by Nick Chase. I hope you will read it. Please take note of those decimal numbers, they are a big part of the fraud allegations that I will not get deeply into now.
Literally thousands of technical savvy individuals have taken all that information which was transferred from states to Edison to media outlets. They have put the transmitted data into spreadsheets where it could be analyzed. For the past month those figures from every state have been analyzed and dissected by countless people, and they have some serious unanswered questions.
What they found initially and continue to find appears to be manipulation of votes. Here, from the American Greatness article is what the code above shows:
1. 12:04 AM, total votes 3,524,459; Trump 1,617,727 votes (45.9%), Biden 1,846,817 votes (52.4%).
2. 12:07 AM, total votes 3,572,807; Trump, 1,643,491 votes (46.0%), Biden 1,872,151 votes (52.4%).
3. 12:12 AM, total votes 3,199,165; Trump, 1,605,981 votes (50.2%), Biden 1,541,998 votes (48.2%).
4. 12:26:21 AM, total votes 3,390,813; Trump, 1,678,452 votes (49.5%), Biden 1,654,717 votes (48.8%).
5. 12:26:48 AM, total votes 3,782,386; Trump, 1,758,890 votes (46.5%), Biden 1,963,058 votes (51.9%).
6. 12:30 AM, total votes 3,390,813; Trump, 1,678,452 votes (49.5%), Biden 1,654,717 votes (48.8%).
7. 12:38 AM, total votes 3,439,609; Trump, 1,699,167 votes (49.4%), Biden 1,685,408 votes (49.0%).
8. 12:42 AM, total votes 3,441,979; Trump, 1,700,338 votes (49.4%), Biden 1,686,570 votes (49.0%).
9. 12:43 AM, total votes 3,442,999; Trump, 1,700,841 votes (49.4%) Biden 1,687,070 votes (49.0%).
10. 12:58 AM, total votes 3,488,507; Trump, 1,709,368 votes (49.0%), Biden 1,719,834 votes (49.3%).
11. 1;34 AM, total votes 3,498,592; Trump, 1,717,808 votes (49.1%), Biden 1,724,806 votes (49.3%).
12. 2:17 AM, total votes 3,894,363; Trump, 1,795,301 votes (46.1%), Biden 2,032,857 votes (52.2%).
13. 4:00 AM, total votes 4,157,392; Trump, 1,916,558 votes (44.8%), Biden 2,224,204 votes (53.5%).
14. 4:59 AM, total votes 4,312,181; Trump, 1,927,545 votes (44.7%), Biden 2,315,641 votes (53.7%).
15. 8:02 AM, total votes 4,312,181; Trump, 1,927,545 votes (44.7%), Biden 2,315,641 votes (53.7%).
You can see the obvious problem in lines 4,5 and 6, something happened and Nick Chase explains what he believes was done, and it makes sense. What is undeniable is that in less than 30 seconds almost 400,000 votes were added to the Virginia vote totals then removed, why? It is possible there is another explanation? None has been given. If this was the only such case it might be "no big deal" but literally hundreds if not thousands of such examples exist and everyone from tech nerds and hackers to PHd mathematicians have uncovered potential vote switching, lost votes and other "anomalies" which require an explanation. Brilliant people have taken this potential Edison evidence and reverse engineered it to find very disturbing findings which they cannot explain other than through vote manipulation.
There are countless examples of both candidates having negative votes added to the totals. This can only happen if you are not tabulating votes but rather calculating votes.
Date Time Trump Ttl Biden Ttl Trump Lead Batch T Batch B
11/4/2020 19:34 2392882 2307252 85630 408 393
11/4/2020 19:42 2391099 2310125 80974 -1783 2873
11/4/2020 20:12 2393561 2317272 76289 2462 7147
11/4/2020 20:32 2393562 2317273 76289 1 1
What tabulating process either at the precincts, the state or in transmitting votes to the media would explain this constant finagling with vote totals? Worse, what would explain why batches of votes constantly having identical or near identical percentages for each candidate? It seems like if there is a simple logical explanation for negative votes or any of these other questions that have been raised while they were counting and transmitting votes, someone would just let everyone know, doesn't it?
So the question is, why doesn't Edison or the people who used this information to "call the election" come forward with a reasonable explanation for what seems to be vote stealing? You don't hide the truth if you know the truth won't hurt your cause. Why are all these strange anomalies not being explained?
This a very brief overview of the situation, in this one aspect of many, irregularities that nobody is coming forward to provide an explanation for. This at least involves technical issues where there could be an answer even if difficult to grasp by lay people, other aspects of the voter fraud allegations are far more basic, which I will hopefully write about later.
UPDATES
I thought I would post this and other information relating to the Edison Evidence as updates to this article. There have dozens of such videos and articles over the past month so they may not all be in chronological order but they are all on the same subject matter.
This on is particularly relevant given the video out of Georgia recently and the article about this can be found here:
Below are the vote changes in the above video. One important item which they allude to but do not spell out is "precinct reporting changes which are hard to see on these screenshots they provide in the video.
Comments